There is a lot of talk on the Web regarding search engine   optimization (SEO) and how, if you just do this one thing, you will be   at the top of Google. If only it were that easy. In fact, I believe   there are seven distinct rules that a search engine optimizer needs to   possess. Most people possess one or maybe two of these skills, very   rarely do people posses all seven. In truth, to obtain all seven of   theses skills will take time and effort — and, if you are running your   own business, do you really have the time to do this?
The golden rules that I believe are necessary for SEO work are:
1. Web Design – Producing a visually attractive page.
2. HTML coding – Developing search engine-friendly coding that sits behind the Wweb design.
3. Copy writing – Producing the actual readable text on the page.
4. Marketing – What are the actual searches that are being used, what key words actually get more business for your company?
5. An eye for detail — Even the smallest errors can stop spiderbots visiting your site.
6. Patience — There is a time lag on any change you make, waiting is a virtue.
7. IT skills — An appreciation of how search engine programs and the algorithms actually work.
The golden rules that I believe are necessary for SEO work are:
1. Web Design – Producing a visually attractive page.
2. HTML coding – Developing search engine-friendly coding that sits behind the Wweb design.
3. Copy writing – Producing the actual readable text on the page.
4. Marketing – What are the actual searches that are being used, what key words actually get more business for your company?
5. An eye for detail — Even the smallest errors can stop spiderbots visiting your site.
6. Patience — There is a time lag on any change you make, waiting is a virtue.
7. IT skills — An appreciation of how search engine programs and the algorithms actually work.
1. Many website designers produce more and more   eye-catching designs with animations and clever features hoping to   entice the people onto their sites. This is the first big mistake; using   designs like these may actually decrease your chances of a high Google   rating. Yes, that’s right; all that money you have paid for the website   design could be wasted because no one will ever find your site.
The reason for this is that before worrying about bringing people to   your site, you need to get the spiderbots to like your site. Spiderbots   are pieces of software used by the search engine companies to crawl the   Internet looking at all the websites, and then having reviewed the   sites, they use complex algorithms to rank the sites. Some of the   complex techniques used by Web designers cannot be trawled by   spiderbots. They come to your site, look at the HTML code and exit stage   right, without even bothering to rank your site — meaning you will not   be found on any meaningful search.
I am amazed how many times I look at websites and I immediately know   they are a waste of money. The trouble is that both the Web designers   and the company that paid the money really do not want to know this. In   fact, I have stopped playing the messenger of bad news (too many   shootings!); I now work round the problem.
Optimizing a website to be Google-friendly is often a compromise between a visually attractive site and an easy-to-find site.
2. The second skill is that of optimizing the actual   HTML code to be spiderbot-friendly. I put this as different to the web   design because you really do need to be “down and dirty” in the code   rather than using an editor like FrontPage, which is OK for website   design. This skill takes lots of time and experience to develop, and   just when you think you have cracked it, the search engine companies   change the algorithms used to calculate how high your site will appear   in the search results.
This is no place for even the most enthusiastic amateur. Results need   to be constantly monitored, pieces of code added or removed, and a   check kept on what the competition is doing. Many people who design   their own website feel they will get searched because it looks good, and   totally miss out on this step. Without a strong technical understanding   of how spiderbots work, you will always struggle to get your company on   the first results page in Google. We actually run seven test domains   that are testing different theories with different search engines.   Remember that different search engines use different criteria and   algorithms to rank your site — one size does not fit all.
3. Thirdly, I suggested that copy writing is a skill   in its own right. This is the writing of the actual text that people   coming to your site will read. The Googlebot and other spiderbots love   text – but only when written well in properly constructed English. Some   people try to stuff their site with keywords, while others put white   writing on white space (so spiderbots can see it but humans cannot).
Spiderbots are very sophisticated and not only will not fall for   these tricks, they may actively penalize your site – in Google terms,   this is sandboxing. Google takes new sites and “naughty” sites and   effectively sin-bins them for three to six months, you can still be   found, but n0t until results page 14 – which is not very useful. As well   as good English, the spiderbots are also reading the HTML code, so the   copywriter also needs an appreciation of the interplay between the two.   My recommendation for anyone copy writing their own site is to write   normal, well-constructed English sentences that can be read by machine   and human alike.
4. The fourth skill is marketing. After all, this is   what we are doing – marketing you site and hence company and   products/services on the Web. The key here is to set the site up to be   accessible to the searches that will provide most business to you. I   have seen many sites that can be found as you key in the company name.   So the marketing skill requires knowledge of a company’s business, what   they are really trying to sell and an understanding of what actual   searches may provide dividends.
5. The next rule is an eye for detail. Even a simple   change to a Web page can create an error that means the spiderbots will   not crawl your site. Recently, I put a link to a page that didn’t have   www. at the front of the address. The link still worked but the spiders   stopped crawling, and it took my partner to find the error. We have   recently invested in a very sophisticated html validator that picks up   errors that other validators just fail to see. These errors do not stop   the pages displaying correctly to the human eye, but cause massive   problems with spiderbots. Almost all the code that I look at on the Web   using this validator flags major errors, even from SEO companies.
6. The sixth rule is patience — it really is a   virtue. Some people seem to want to make daily changes and then think   they can track the Wweb page ranking results the next day.   Unfortunately, it can take a week for absolutely correct changes to take   effect, in which time you have made six other changes. Add to this   Google’s reticence to allow new sites straight on to its listings by   adding a waiting factor of, maybe, three months for new sites, and you   have a totally uncontrollable situation. We say to all our clients that a   piece of SEO work should be looked at like a marketing campaign that   runs for six months, since it is only after that time that a true   judgment of the effectiveness of the work can be made.
7. The final and seventh skill is an appreciation of   how search engines and algorithms work, for this where both IT and math   experience is useful. People who have programmed at a detailed systems   level have a natural feeling for how spiderbots will read a page, what   they will search for, what tables they will set up, what weightings they   may give to different elements. All of this builds a picture of the   database that will be created and how it will be accessed when a search   is undertaken. Unfortunately, this skill is the most difficult one to   learn because it relies on many years experience of systems programming.
No comments:
Post a Comment